Türkçe ve İspanyolcada fiil çatısı
No Thumbnail Available
Files
Date
2007
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
Abstract
In this work, it has been tried to compare the specific features of voice and the specific features adopted while using these voice in Turkish and Spanish granlmer. There may be a similarity between the categories of voice in Turkish and Spanish grammer in terms of identifacation; however, this similarity is not same for each sub-category. In spanish grammer, causatives and reciprocales are not accepted as a unit of voice. They are accepted to be the kinds of verbs. In spanish, as it is in Turkish, researchers don't give importance to active voice which is the basic form of the verb$ the focus on the usage of passive and reflexive voice forms comparing and contrasting them with the active voice. In this work, the reader is provided with information concerning the usage of verbs and voice, how they work and how they cannot be used together. We have found out that both the usage of voices and the formation of voices are different in both languages. In Turkish grammer, voices are composed with the suffixes which are added to the base of verb. In Spanish grammer, the passive voice is adquired by using "perifrastica" and reflexive voice is acquired with the reflexive pronouns. In Spanish gramer, "se" which is used as a signifier can also be used in a sentence which is deprived of persona. The usage of "se" also cornposes a different klnd of voice; thus, we have dealt with structures including "se" in this work.We have dealt with the features of using "se" Spanish grammer and showed how they are used in a sentence. Considering all the things we have acquired during this work, it can be said clearly that Turkish is a rather adequate language when we compare Turkish grammer with Spanish grammer in terms of the usage, function, implication and exact perception of the concept of voice.
Description
Keywords
Türkçe, İspanyolca, fiil çatısı